Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The fast changing field of social media (SM) research presents unique challenges for research ethics committees (RECs). This article examines notions of experience and expertise in the context of REC members reviewing proposals for SM research and considers the role of the RECs in this area of review. We analyze 19 interviews with REC members to highlight that a lack of personal and professional experience of SM, compounded by a lack of institutional and professional guidelines, mean many REC members feel they do not possess sufficient expertise to review SM research. This view was supported by 14 interviews with SM researchers. REC members drew on strategies to overcome their lack of experience, although most SM researchers still found this problematic, to varying degrees. We recommend several steps to ensure REC expertise in SM research keeps pace of this fast-developing field, taking a pro-active, dialogic approach.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1177/1556264619837088

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2020-02-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

15

Pages

28 - 39

Total pages

11

Addresses

U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , Y, o, r, k, ,, , U, K, .

Keywords

Humans, Data Collection, Research Design, Professional Competence, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Research, Research Personnel, Guidelines as Topic, Social Media