Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This article provides a comparative analysis of digital interventions implemented in Taiwan and the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic to examine how national contexts shaped the rollout and reception of these technologies. Our analysis challenges the simplistic East/West divide often invoked in pandemic response analyses, which arose during and in the wake of the pandemic, arguing that successes or failures of digital health interventions must exceed assumed cultural traits in East or West, and consider sociohistorical factors, legal frameworks, and specific political contexts. By advancing interdisciplinary co-learning between research communities in Taiwan and the UK, this article offers actionable insights for enhancing digital preparedness for future global public health emergencies, underscoring the importance of cultures of preparedness, transparency, and public trust and responsible data governance for digital health technologies.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1080/17441692.2025.2593786

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

20

Addresses

I, n, s, t, i, t, u, t, e, , f, o, r, , G, l, o, b, a, l, , H, e, a, l, t, h, ,, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , C, o, l, l, e, g, e, , L, o, n, d, o, n, ,, , L, o, n, d, o, n, ,, , U, K, .

Keywords

Humans, Public Health, Telemedicine, Taiwan, Pandemics, United Kingdom, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Digital Technology