Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractSecondary‐structure prediction has been used to investigate the conformation of the N‐ and C‐terminal telopeptides for type I and type III collagen. The three predictive methods (Chou and Fasman, Robson and co‐workers, Lim) indicate mainly aperiodic conformations. A common structural motif is provided by the positioning of β‐turns, particularly in the vicinity of the residue sites involved in intermolecular cross‐links. An alternative model to that of Helseth et al [(1979) Biopolymers 18, 3005–3014] for the secondary structure of the N‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen is proposed. The general features of these two contrasting structures have been surveyed by model‐building techniques employing molecular graphics and energy minimization. The role of the telopeptide component in the structural design of the biomaterial collagen is assessed. Notably, the alternative model clearly serves to demonstrate the compatibility of current cross‐linking evidence with the quasi‐hexagonal model for the packing of molecules within a collagen fibril.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/bip.360260403

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

1987-04-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

26

Pages

463 - 480

Total pages

17