Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

ABSTRACTObjective:Assays for antibodies against native gliadin (anti‐nGli) are still often assumed to perform better in the diagnosis of coeliac disease in young children than tests for antibodies to deamidated gliadin (anti‐dGli), tissue transglutaminase (anti‐tTG), and endomysium (EmA). We compared the performance of assays for anti‐nGli, anti‐dGli, anti‐tTG, and EmA in this age group.Methods:We investigated retrospectively 184 children (42 with coeliac disease under normal diet and 142 controls) up to 2 years of age. Immunoglobulin (Ig) A‐ and IgG‐anti‐dGli, IgA‐ and IgG‐anti‐nGli, IgA‐ and IgG‐anti‐tTG, and IgA‐EmA were measured in serum. Areas under receiver operating characteristics curves, sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated.Results:From all of the tests investigated, only assays for IgG‐anti‐dGli, IgA‐anti‐tTG, and IgA‐EmA had high specificity (≥0.96) connected with high sensitivity (≥0.86), with high positive predictive values (≥0.52 and ≥0.69 at pretest probabilities of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively) and negative predictive values (≥0.99 and ≥0.98 at pretest probabilities of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively). These assays also showed high positive likelihood ratio (≥24) at low negative likelihood ratio (≤0.15) and high diagnostic odds ratios (≥136).Conclusions:Our results do not support the use of assays of anti‐nGli to diagnose coeliac disease in young children. IgA‐anti‐tTG, IgA‐EmA, and IgG‐anti‐dGli perform better than anti‐nGli.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/mpg.0b013e31824678fc

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

07/2012

Volume

55

Pages

21 - 25