Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Policy-makers, doctors, organizations, and academics who are persuaded that health care decarbonization is an ethical mandate are grappling with ethical and effective implementation of measures to support this goal. Health care carbon-mitigation strategies (both proposed and potential) at individual, regional (city, state, or council), national, and international levels have already been analyzed to different degrees; however, a comparative analysis of strategies at each of these levels that takes into account bioethical issues such as autonomy, responsibility, and shared decision-making has not previously been conducted (though some analysis between national and international efforts has occurred). This essay offers a comparative analysis of the ethical aspects of health care carbon reduction across these levels, including considerations of responsibility and of the potential for efforts at each level to actually impact climate change.

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/hast.5008

Type

Journal article

Journal

The Hastings Center report

Publication Date

05/2025

Volume

55

Pages

7 - 14

Keywords

Humans, Social Responsibility, Delivery of Health Care, Climate Change