The effect of bariatric surgery type on cardiac reverse remodelling
Henry JA., Abdesselam I., Deal O., Lewis AJ., Rayner J., Bernard M., Dutour A., Gaborit B., Kober F., Soghomonian A., Sgromo B., Byrne J., Bege T., Borlaug BA., Neubauer S., Rider OJ.
Abstract Introduction Bariatric surgery is effective in reversing adverse cardiac remodelling in obesity. However, it is unclear whether the three commonly performed operations; Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) are equal in their ability to reverse remodelling. Methods Fifty-eight patients underwent CMR to assess left ventricular mass (LVM), LV mass:volume ratio (LVMVR) and LV eccentricity index (LVei) before and after bariatric surgery (26 RYGB, 22 LSG and 10 LAGB), including 46 with short-term (median 251–273 days) and 43 with longer-term (median 983–1027 days) follow-up. Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) were also assessed. Results All three procedures resulted in significant decreases in excess body weight (48–70%). Percentage change in VAT and EAT was significantly greater following RYGB and LSG compared to LAGB at both timepoints (VAT:RYGB −47% and −57%, LSG −47% and −54%, LAGB −31% and −25%; EAT:RYGB −13% and −14%, LSG –16% and −19%, LAGB −5% and −5%). Patients undergoing LAGB, whilst having reduced LVM (−1% and −4%), had a smaller decrease at both short (RYGB: −8%, p < 0.005; LSG: −11%, p < 0.0001) and long (RYGB: −12%, p = 0.009; LSG: −13%, p < 0.0001) term timepoints. There was a significant decrease in LVMVR at the long-term timepoint following both RYGB (−7%, p = 0.006) and LSG (−7%, p = 0.021), but not LAGB (−2%, p = 0.912). LVei appeared to decrease at the long-term timepoint in those undergoing RYGB (−3%, p = 0.063) and LSG (−4%, p = 0.015), but not in those undergoing LAGB (1%, p = 0.857). In all patients, the change in LVM correlated with change in VAT (r = 0.338, p = 0.0134), while the change in LVei correlated with change in EAT (r = 0.437, p = 0.001). Conclusions RYGB and LSG appear to result in greater decreases in visceral adiposity, and greater reverse LV remodelling with larger reductions in LVM, concentric remodelling and pericardial restraint than LAGB.